Re: error out when building pg_xlogdump with pgxs
От | Cédric Villemain |
---|---|
Тема | Re: error out when building pg_xlogdump with pgxs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2218426.68012B22s7@obelix обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: error out when building pg_xlogdump with pgxs (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: error out when building pg_xlogdump with pgxs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Le jeudi 29 août 2013 11:52:36 Andres Freund a écrit : > On 2013-08-29 11:49:00 +0200, Cédric Villemain wrote: > > Le mercredi 28 août 2013 00:12:22 Andres Freund a écrit : > > > Hi Alvaro, > > > > > > On 2013-08-27 14:47:49 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > > Andres Freund wrote: > > > > > pg_xlogdump cannot properly be built with pgxs since it needs a > > > > > sourcetree around. That already has confused some users... > > > > > > > > > > How about the attached patch which will tell it's not supported > > > > > instead > > > > > of an ominous build error about files that have no rules? > > > > > > > > Hmm, the other option is to ignore USE_PGXS completely and build > > > > assuming the source tree is always present. That way, if you build > > > > the > > > > whole contrib subdir with USE_PGXS=1, you will end up with all modules > > > > being built, not stop in the middle with an error. This seems more > > > > useful to me. We could just add a comment that USE_PGXS is ignored. > > > > > > What's the point in doing USE_PGXS builds with a full and configured > > > source present? The only thing I can think of is testing that pgxs > > > builds are working. In that case it doesn't seem helpful to fake > > > something into working which is then going to fail for real USE_PGXS > > > builds (where the original sourcetree won't be at that location > > > anymore). > > > > I had the same idea when Peter wished to remove PGXS from the contrib > > shiped with postgreSQL. > > > > I've been convinced that if we want to apply testing on pgxs makefile then > > we need something dedicated. Not abusing the current options. > > > > I'm in favor of removing PGXS from all contrib makefile, not only this > > one. > > Can we please discuss that in another thread? Anything like removing > PGXS wholesale is for sure not going to be something in 9.3 and this > specific issue should be fixed there as it already confused experienced > users. Andres, I was answering your question. Short and re-phrased:* we should not abuse make USE_PGXS to test the contrib build* I believe your patch is correct to issuean error when trying to build pg_xlogdump with PGXS, it is not possible, dot. -- Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52 http://2ndQuadrant.fr/ PostgreSQL: Support 24x7 - Développement, Expertise et Formation
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: