Re: Built-in binning functions
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Built-in binning functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22103.1409528923@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Built-in binning functions (David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Built-in binning functions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes: > Since "bucket" is the 'verb' here (in this specific case meaning "lookup the > supplied value in the supplied bucket definition") and "width" is a modifier > (the bucket specification describes an equal-width structure) I suggest > "literal_bucket(val, array[])" such that the bucket is still the verb but > now the modifier describes a structure that is literally provided. It's a very considerable stretch to see "bucket" as a verb here :-). Maybe that's why the SQL committee's choice of function name seems so unnatural (to me anyway). I was wondering about bucket_index(), ie "get the index of the bucket this value falls into". Or get_bucket(), or get_bucket_index() if you like verbosity. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: