Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15)
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 220fab30-dff0-b055-f803-4338219f1021@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15) (Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 29.03.22 15:09, Aleksander Alekseev wrote: > Hi hackers, > >> I took another look at the patchset. Personally I don't think it will get much >> better than it is now. I'm inclined to change the status of the CF entry to >> "Ready for Committer" unless anyone disagrees. > >>> About v25-0002-Use-64-bit-format-to-output-XIDs.patch: >>> I don't see the point of applying this now. It doesn't make PG15 any >>> better. It's just a patch part of which we might need later. >> >> AFAICT, this patch provides no actual functionality change, so holding >> it a bit for early in the PG16 cycle wouldn't lose anything. > > OK. As I understand we still have a consensus that v30-0001 (SLRU refactoring, > not the XID formatting) is targeting PG15, so I changed the CF entry to > "Ready for Committer" for this single patch. I rechecked it again on the > current `master` branch without the other patches and it is OK. cfbot is happy > with the patchset as well. That isn't really what I meant. When I said > At this point, I'm more concerned that code review is still finding > bugs, and that we have no test coverage for any of this this meant especially the SLRU refactoring patch.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: