Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22095.1346526417@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 02:43:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm inclined to think that the "no sockdir" case is broken and you >> should get rid of it. If you're starting a postmaster, you can and >> should tell it a sockdir, period. If you're running a live check this >> code is all moot anyway. > I don't think you understand. The "no sockdir" case is only for live > checks of pre-9.1 old servers, because we can't find the socket > directory being used. Everything else uses the local directory for the > socket. If we remove that case, we can't do live checks on pre-9.1 > servers. If it's a live check, then (a) you aren't restarting the postmaster, and (b) you wouldn't want to lock out TCP anyway. So adding --listen-addresses to the string seems pointless and/or wrong. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: