Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> In fact only REL_10_STABLE had the problem, because commit 2cf8c7aa
> already fixed the other instance in later branches. I'd entirely
> forgotten that earlier discussion, which apparently didn't quite go
> far enough. So I only needed to push the with.sql change. Done.
Hah, I thought this felt familiar. So the real problem is that
my backpatch (b15a8c963) only fixed half of the hazard. Sigh.
regards, tom lane