Re: Access to dynamic SQL in PL/pgSQL
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Access to dynamic SQL in PL/pgSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2208.1264178017@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Access to dynamic SQL in PL/pgSQL (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Access to dynamic SQL in PL/pgSQL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > Anyway, there already was another way of doing this, so it shall be done > that way instead. The beauty of a pluggable architecture is that one > does not need approval to implement customer solutions. If you're talking about a bundle that you're shipping to customers, of course you can do whatever you want, since you can ensure that your plpgsql.so and your plugin are compatible. Stuff we release into the wide world doesn't have that luxury. We can't assume much more than what PG_MODULE_MAGIC will enforce for us, and that means ABI breaks within a major release series are dangerous. But to get back to the point, what have you got against adding another plugin call within the statements that build dynamic queries? It seems like a much cleaner solution to me, and not any different from the standpoint of back-portability. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: