Re: Defaults for replication/backup
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Defaults for replication/backup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22066.1455378755@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Defaults for replication/backup (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Defaults for replication/backup
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > Yes, these changes will increase some of the default overhead. My argument > against that is that anybody who actually cares about that overhead is > going to be tuning their database *anyway*, so they can just change things > back to the old defaults. > So, I suggest the following changes to the defaults: > wal_level=hot_standby > max_wal_senders=10 > max_replication_slots=10 It would be easier to sell this if we had some numbers for the amount of overhead it would add for people *not* using the features. I do not think I've ever seen, eg, pgbench results with different wal_level and all else the same. > And in pg_hba.conf, we enable the replication connections by default for > the superuser on local/localhost. Potential security implications? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: