Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> I can live with SELECT fx(x). It is little bit dangerous, but this risk can
> be easy detected by plpgsql_check.
Dangerous how?
>> So, I'm -1 on not having any keyword at all. I have no objection
>> to Merlin's proposal though. I agree that PERFORM is starting to
>> look a bit silly, since it doesn't play with WITH for instance.
> Isn't time to fix PERFORM instead?
I do not think it can be fixed without embedding knowledge of PERFORM into
the core parser, which I doubt anybody would consider a good idea.
regards, tom lane