AW: Proposal: TRUNCATE TABLE table RESTRICT
От | Zeugswetter Andreas SB |
---|---|
Тема | AW: Proposal: TRUNCATE TABLE table RESTRICT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C604AF7DCD@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: AW: Proposal: TRUNCATE TABLE table RESTRICT
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> It seems the truncate command deletes all rows from a table even it is > referenced by another tables. TRUNCATE is not in the standard any way, > so I would not claim this is a bug. However, sometimes it would be > helpful for a user to let him notice that the table about to be > truncated is referenced by some tables. So I would propose to add > "RESTRICT" option to the command. I mean if RESTRICT is specified, > TRUNCATE will fail if the table is referenced. > > BTW, the keyword "RESTRICT" is inspired by the fact that DROP TABLE > has the same option according to the standard. If a table is > referenced by some tables and the drop table command has the RESTRICT > option, it would fail. This seems to be a nice feature too. Truncate should probably check if all referencing tables are empty and fail if not. Truncate should imho not lead to a violated constraint situation. Strictly speaking the current situation is more or less a bug. Andreas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: