Re: pg_restore multiple --function options
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_restore multiple --function options |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21970.1377634902@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_restore multiple --function options (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> writes: > As the code stands, you have to pass the argument types to the > --function flag, ie. --function="myfunc(integer)". It's annoyingly picky > about the spelling, as the it has to match exactly what pg_dump prints, > but it does handle selecting one function from a group of overloaded > ones. Oh --- OK, I was misremembering. I recalled that people weren't happy with the handling of --function, but had the details wrong. [pokes around] I think really the issues are (1) it only works in pg_restore, not pg_dump, and (2) there's no wildcard matching (the pickiness about argument type name spelling being perhaps a subset of that). It's probably true that accepting multiple patterns doesn't preclude solving either of those, and indeed might help users work around (2). So nevermind that objection. But I still say this is all too late for 9.3. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: