Re: transformLockingClause() bug
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: transformLockingClause() bug |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2192900.1657117838@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | transformLockingClause() bug (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> writes: > The problem is that the parser has generated a join rte with > eref->aliasname = "unnamed_join", and then transformLockingClause() > finds that before finding the relation rte for t3 whose user-supplied > alias is also "unnamed_join". > I think the answer is that transformLockingClause() should ignore join > rtes that don't have a user-supplied alias, since they are not visible > as relation names in the query (and then [1] will want to do the same > for subquery and values rtes without aliases). Agreed. > Except, if the rte has a join_using_alias (and no regular alias), I > think transformLockingClause() should actually be matching on that and > then throwing the above error. So for the following: Yeah, that's clearly an oversight in the join_using_alias patch. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: