Re: State of Beta 2
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: State of Beta 2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21919.1063254353@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: State of Beta 2 ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: State of Beta 2
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Vivek Khera wrote: > "AR" == Andrew Rawnsley <ronz@ravensfield.com> writes: >> AR> Anyone out there using beta 2 in production situations? >> >> I'm pondering doing the same, but I'm not 100% sure there won't be any >> dump/restore-required changes to it before it goes gold. As you shouldn't be ... There's some major-league whining going on right now in the jdbc list about the fact that "int8col = 42" isn't indexable. While we know that solving this problem in the general case is hard, it occurred to me this afternoon that fixing it just for int8 might not be so hard --- maybe just taking out the int8-vs-int4 comparison operators would improve matters. I might be willing to advocate another initdb to do that, if it seems to help that situation without introducing other issues. It's not well tested as yet, but stay tuned ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: