Re: pg_dump 8.0.3 failing against PostgreSQL 7.3.2
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump 8.0.3 failing against PostgreSQL 7.3.2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21897.1118089992@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump 8.0.3 failing against PostgreSQL 7.3.2 (Jochem van Dieten <jochemd@oli.tudelft.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump 8.0.3 failing against PostgreSQL 7.3.2
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Jochem van Dieten <jochemd@oli.tudelft.nl> writes: > That's different from backtracing a core dump :) This better? > Breakpoint 1, 0x16d8f8 in elog () > (gdb) bt > #0 0x16d8f8 in elog () > #1 0x110abb in pg_exec_query_string () > #2 0x112a91 in PostgresMain () > #3 0xf4eae in DoBackend () > #4 0xf463d in BackendStartup () > #5 0xf3040 in ServerLoop () > #6 0xf2502 in PostmasterMain () > #7 0xc9926 in main () Drat. I forgot that in 7.3, elog will be entered even if the message ends up being too low-priority to be output. What you've got here is just a routine elog(DEBUG) or elog(LOG) call ... and there are probably a whole bunch more that will happen before the one with ERROR. [ studies 7.3 code a bit ] It might work better to set the breakpoint at elog_message_prefix, assuming you've got logging dialed down to the point where only actual ERRORs go to the log. However, I'm not certain gdb will let you do that in a backend compiled without debug support; it may not know about elog_message_prefix since that's just a static routine. Give it a try and see. If that doesn't work ... can anyone think of another way to isolate the elog(ERROR) call in a backend compiled without debug support? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: