Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21863.1253980747@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > Right, that works. Updated patch attached; should solve the issues > raised in the thread. I renamed the catalog pg_db_role_setting as > suggested by Tom. > ... > I have also added a view, whose only purpose is to convert the role and > database OIDs into names. It's been named pg_db_role_settings, but if > anyone has a better suggestion I'm all ears. I dislike the idea of having a catalog and a view whose names are the same except for a plural. It's confusing as heck, because no one will remember which is which. Since pg_settings is the existing user view, I think pg_db_role_settings is a reasonable choice for the new view, but then we need a different name for the catalog. The only thing that comes to mind right now is "pg_db_role_default", but I don't like it much. Anybody have other suggestions? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: