Re: Why is src/test/modules/committs/t/002_standby.pl flaky?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why is src/test/modules/committs/t/002_standby.pl flaky? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2182667.1643079012@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why is src/test/modules/committs/t/002_standby.pl flaky? (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why is src/test/modules/committs/t/002_standby.pl flaky?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 10:28 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: >> On 2022-01-24 15:35:25 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Sure. Do we want to revert in HEAD too? >> Not sure. I'm also OK with trying to go with Thomas' patch to walreceiver and >> try a bit longer to get all this working. Thomas? > I vote for reverting in release branches only. I'll propose a better > WES patch set for master that hopefully also covers async append etc > (which I was already planning to do before we knew about this Windows > problem). More soon. WFM, but we'll have to remember to revert this in v15 if we don't have a solid fix by then. It's kinda late here, so I'll push the reverts tomorrow. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: