Re: how to serialize insert followed by read(select) by different clients
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: how to serialize insert followed by read(select) by different clients |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21823.1470584598@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | how to serialize insert followed by read(select) by different clients (Sandeep Gupta <gupta.sandeep@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: how to serialize insert followed by read(select) by
different clients
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Sandeep Gupta <gupta.sandeep@gmail.com> writes: > First program, lets say the writer, (using psql) appends to a table > in the database. > Second program, the reader, (python using alchemy) reads the data. > This happens in loop, one for each day.The programs are fired in that order > and the first program always commits after it inserts new rows. > The problem is that the second program does not see the updates of the first > program consistently. There are only two possible explanations for that: 1. The writer isn't actually issuing a COMMIT when you think it is. 2. The reader is using a stale snapshot, ie it's using SERIALIZABLE or REPEATABLE READ transaction mode and its transaction started before the writer committed. If you're having trouble identifying the cause of the problem you might try setting "log_statement = all" and looking at where BEGINs and COMMITs get issued. (Well, I guess that only exhausts the possibilities as long as this is happening on a single database server. If the reader is reading from a hot-standby slave then replication delays might explain your problem. But that would be a rather material omission of facts.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: