Re: Unions and Grouping
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Unions and Grouping |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21818.1166218924@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Unions and Grouping ("Aaron Bono" <postgresql@aranya.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Unions and Grouping
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
"Aaron Bono" <postgresql@aranya.com> writes: > My question, what do the SQL Specifications say should happen on a Union? > Is it supposed to eliminate duplicates even WITHIN the individual queries > that are being unioned? Yes. SQL92 7.10 saith: b) If a set operator is specified, then the result of applying the set operator is a table containingthe following rows: i) Let R be a row that is a duplicate of some row in T1 or of some row in T2 or both. Let m bethe number of duplicates of R in T1 and let n be the number of duplicates of R in T2, wherem >= 0 and n >= 0. ii) If ALL is not specified, then Case: 1) If UNION is specified, then Case: A) If m > 0 or n > 0, then T contains exactly one dupli- cate of R. B) Otherwise, T contains no duplicate of R. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: