Re: Regression test failure on 7.0-STABLE
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Regression test failure on 7.0-STABLE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2176.959492164@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Regression test failure on 7.0-STABLE (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes: > I saw some errors on the regression test, and they are new to me. > Here are the output from checkresults. > ====== rules ====== > 1168d1167 > < pg_indexes | SELECT c.relname AS tablename, i.relname AS indexname, pg_get_indexdef(x.indexrelid) AS indexdefFROM pg_index x, pg_class c, pg_class i WHERE ((c.oid = x.indrelid) AND (i.oid = x.indexrelid)); > 1187c1186 > < (20 rows) > --- >> (19 rows) > ====== foreign_key ====== > 11a12 >> NOTICE: _outNode: don't know how to print type 726 > 235a237 >> NOTICE: _outNode: don't know how to print type 726 > I guess the error on foreign_key is caused by -d 3 turned on(does this > hurt anything?) But what about the rules? The NOTICEs are caused by a known omission: the foreign-key boys didn't bother to add an outfuncs.c routine for node type FkConstraint. Should be pretty harmless AFAIK. The rules discrepancy is much more disturbing. Is it repeatable? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: