Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 21740.1123642896@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method (Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews@supernews.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews@supernews.com> writes:
>> If a SCSI drive reports write complete when it hasn't actually put the
>> bits on the platter yet, then it's simply broken.
> I guess you haven't read the spec much, then.
[ shrug... ] I have seen that spec before: I was making a living by
implementing SCSI device drivers in the mid-80's. I think that anyone
who uses WCE in place of tagged command queueing is not someone whose
code I would care to rely on for mission-critical applications. TCQ
is a design that just works; WCE is someone's attempt to emulate all
the worst features of IDE.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: