Re: adminpack and pg_catalog
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: adminpack and pg_catalog |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21739.1161407583@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: adminpack and pg_catalog (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes: > On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 22:59 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Nothing except initdb should add objects in pg_catalog. AFAICS, >> adminpack doesn't have any special requirements, so it should behave >> like all other contrib modules. > Okay. Are there any opinions on whether we should make this change to > contrib/adminpack now (i.e. during the 8.2 beta), later (for 8.3), or > not all at? AFAIR the point of adminpack was to support pgAdmin, which expects those functions to be in pg_catalog. At some point we might as well just take it out instead of whack it until it meets some arbitrary restrictions and isn't at all backwards-compatible anymore. (No, I don't find these arguments that it mustn't put anything in pg_catalog to be very compelling ... if we seriously believed that, we'd have arranged for the system to enforce it.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: