Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21714.1042866534@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4? (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4?
Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4? Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes: > Incidentally, has anyone else noticed the security update onslaught from Red > Hat for older PostgreSQL versions? They even backported the fixes to 6.5.3 > from Red Hat 6.2 (as well as for 7.0 and 7.1 as released in the respective > Red Hat Linux versions). Should I forward that notice here? Some of the guys in Toronto got excited about it, but I can't see a lot of value there myself. If you're still running 6.5.3, is it likely you notice updates from anywhere? Red Hat 6.2 is still nominally supported (until March 31, it says here) so I suppose there's a corporate compulsion to back-patch anything that's labeled a security issue. But let's get real ... PG 6.anything is stone-age code now. regards, tom lane Red Hat Database project PS: I'm not taking a position on Justin's suggestion that there should be a 7.2.4. Marc and Bruce would be the ones who have to do the work, so they get to make the decision...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: