Re: Vacuuming
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vacuuming |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21713.1178591249@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Vacuuming (Paul Lambert <paul.lambert@autoledgers.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: Vacuuming
Re: Vacuuming |
Список | pgsql-general |
Paul Lambert <paul.lambert@autoledgers.com.au> writes: > Is there any point to vacuuming a table if it has been bulk-populated by > data after a truncate? > I.e. If I do this: > TRUNCATE TABLE vehicles; > INSERT INTO vehicles (SELECT DISTINCT ON (dealer_id,vehicle_address) * > FROM vehicles_temp_load WHERE (dealer_id,vehicle_address) is not null); > Is there any point in vacuuming? The only thing a vacuum would do for you there is set the commit hint bits on the newly-inserted rows. Which might be worth doing if you want to get the table into a totally "clean" state, but it's probably a bit excessive. SELECTs on the table will set the hint bits anyway as they visit not-yet-hinted rows, so it's really a matter of do you want to pay that overhead all at once or spread-out. What you *do* want to do in this situation is an ANALYZE. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: