Re: Fun fact about autovacuum and orphan temp tables
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fun fact about autovacuum and orphan temp tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2171.1477097105@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fun fact about autovacuum and orphan temp tables (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fun fact about autovacuum and orphan temp tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 12:15 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote: >> On 10/21/16 8:47 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> If we are willing to do that then we don't really have to solve the >>> problem on the backend side. One could expect that autovacuum would >>> clean things up within a few minutes after a backend failure. > I am really thinking that we should just do that and call it a day > then, but document the fact that if one wants to look at the content > of orphaned tables after a crash he had better turn autovacuum to off > for the time of the analysis. Yeah, agreed. This also points up the value of Robert's suggestion of a "really off" setting. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: