Re: pgsql-server/src/backend commands/typecmds.c e ...
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql-server/src/backend commands/typecmds.c e ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 217.1063174190@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pgsql-server/src/backend commands/typecmds.c e ... (petere@svr1.postgresql.org (Peter Eisentraut - PostgreSQL)) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql-server/src/backend commands/typecmds.c e ...
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
petere@svr1.postgresql.org (Peter Eisentraut - PostgreSQL) writes: > Modified files: > src/backend/commands: typecmds.c > src/backend/executor: execQual.c functions.c > src/backend/parser: gram.y > src/backend/tcop: utility.c > src/backend/utils/adt: acl.c array_userfuncs.c pgstatfuncs.c > ri_triggers.c ruleutils.c sets.c varbit.c > src/backend/utils/fmgr: funcapi.c > Log message: > Some "feature not supported" errors are better syntax errors, because the > feature they complain about isn't a feature or cannot be implemented without > definitional changes. I looked over this change, and right offhand I don't agree with any of it. None of the errors are "syntax" errors (if they were, gram.y would have barfed) and the textual error message changes generally seem to be trending in a less not more helpful direction. What is your rationale for this, please? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: