timestamp subtraction (was Re: formatting intervals with to_char)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | timestamp subtraction (was Re: formatting intervals with to_char) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21619.1160067054@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | formatting intervals with to_char (Graham Davis <gdavis@refractions.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] timestamp subtraction (was Re: formatting intervals with to_char)
Re: [HACKERS] timestamp subtraction (was Re: formatting intervals with to_char) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
Graham Davis <gdavis@refractions.net> writes: > The documentation for to_char states that: > "|to_char(interval)| formats HH and HH12 as hours in a single day, while > HH24 can output hours exceeding a single day, e.g. >24." > However I can not get it to work with time intervals that span more than > 1 day. Well, it does in fact print intervals exceeding 24 hours: regression=# select to_char('48 hours'::interval, 'HH24:MI:SS');to_char ----------48:00:00 (1 row) However, '48 hours' and '2 days' are not the same thing. The problem with the case you give is really that timestamp_mi applies justify_hours to its result --- that is, regression=# select ('2006-09-15 23:59:00'::timestamp - '2006-09-01 09:30:41'::timestamp); ?column? ------------------14 days 14:28:19 (1 row) should be reporting '350:28:19' instead. This is a hack that was done to minimize the changes in the regression test expected outputs when we changed type interval from months/seconds to months/days/seconds. But I wonder whether it wasn't a dumb idea. It is certainly inconsistent, as noted in the code comments. I'm tempted to propose that we remove the justify_hours call, and tell anyone who really wants the old results to apply justify_hours() to the subtraction result for themselves. Not sure what the fallout would be, though. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: