Re: BUG #16279: Permissions doc incorrect for pg_buffercache
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16279: Permissions doc incorrect for pg_buffercache |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21597.1582839094@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #16279: Permissions doc incorrect for pg_buffercache (Philip Semanchuk <philip@americanefficient.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #16279: Permissions doc incorrect for pg_buffercache
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Philip Semanchuk <philip@americanefficient.com> writes: > On Feb 26, 2020, at 12:11 PM, Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org> wrote: >> You are right, in contrib/pg_buffercache/pg_buffercache--1.2--1.3.sql we have >> GRANT EXECUTE ON FUNCTION pg_buffercache_pages() TO pg_monitor; >> GRANT SELECT ON pg_buffercache TO pg_monitor; >> Not pg_read_all_stats. I'm not sure: we need change the extension or fix the documentation? I think pg_read_all_statswould be more appropriate, but we need bump the extension version. > Thanks for exploring and confirming! I agree that pg_read_all_stats would be more appropriate. Looking at the original discussion, it seems clear that the choice of pg_monitor was intentional; see in particular https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BOCxowV7eL-DS1Hr-h5N7Tr8Gvn5VGW%2B%2BYJ2yo6wMN9H3n9Gg%40mail.gmail.com So I think the code is correct and the documentation is a typo. That's a much easier answer to back-patch, as well. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: