RE: Why Not MySQL?
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Why Not MySQL? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 215896B6B5E1CF11BC5600805FFEA8210304637F@sirius.edu.sollentuna.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Why Not MySQL? (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> If I may. > MS Access for all of it's damnable faults is the single most > popular database in the world. There are a whole slew of > people who do nothing except access programming and make very > good money at it. Postgres is a great candidate as a possible > back end database engine for access. This is a big possible > application for postgres. To be usable for this purpose > however it needs a few things. > 1) Longer object names (I guess this is possible via a DEFINE) > 2) Case insensitive queries. > 3) Outer joins (coming soon!). > 4) Maybe ADO drivers for the VB users of the world. Should be no major need for a separate ADO driver for Pg. You can use ADO going through the ODBC driver, which already exists. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: