Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21578.1175276345@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > Hmmm, remember that DatabaseCancelAutovacuumActivity is called on CREATE > DATABASE; but what it does is send SIGINT, not SIGTERM. Also, it's not > in 8.2. SIGINT does terminate the autovac process however. > I haven't read the whole problem report completely, so I'm not sure this > has something to do or not. AFAICT, SIGINT should be okay, because it will lead to an ERROR not a FATAL elog; so control should fall out through the CATCH block before the autovacuum process quits. The problem is with FATAL elogs. Mark reports that the only FATAL lines in his logs are instances ofFATAL: terminating connection due to administrator commandFATAL: database "launchpad_ftest" does not exist and the latter presumably isn't coming out from within the btree vacuum code, so I don't see any other explanation for a FATAL exit than SIGTERM. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: