Re: 8.0 Open Items
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8.0 Open Items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21565.1093100575@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 8.0 Open Items (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 8.0 Open Items
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Okay, I don't want to force an initdb just for this either. But if we >> do one for other reasons, it's toast. > I don't see why an initdb is required: if we want to remove it, we can > replace the function's implementation with elog(ERROR, "this function > has been removed"), or the like. The difference between doing that much > and actually removing the function's catalog entry is pretty negligible > from the user's POV. No, not at all. A nonfunctional catalog entry gets in the way of the user replacing the function, should he wish to do that. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: