Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21565.1011921135@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I said: > Yeah, I do recall that some versions had a tmp-scrubber that didn't make > any exception for socket files. But it's kind of a big coincidence to > assume that would happen just while Michael was running his benchmark. ... or maybe not. I just looked back at Michael's benchmark page and observed that the extrapolated time to complete the run in question was over 24 hours (and the first two parts of the script would've taken more than 12). If he'd left the machine alone for a couple of days while the script ran, maybe it's credible that a /tmp-scrubber did its thing meanwhile. That still leaves us with all the defunct postmaster children to explain though. Hmm. I wonder exactly what the postmaster does when someone forcibly removes its socket file... probably system-dependent, but I could certainly believe getting into a busy-wait loop of select/accept. That doesn't look like it should prevent SIGCHLD from getting noticed, though. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: