Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bug (was Re: [SQL] Slow Inserts Again)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bug (was Re: [SQL] Slow Inserts Again) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21495.925772232@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_dump bug (was Re: [SQL] Slow Inserts Again) ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu> writes: > P.S. shouldn't the non existence of the table handed to pg_dump raise a > user visible error? Probably. > P.P.S. How does one go about setting up a second version of PG to test > on the same machine, without interference with the production (older) > version? I've only got the one machine to test on. No problem, I do that all the time. When running "configure", override the default install location *and* the default port number. For example, I build test versions using --with-pgport=5440 --prefix=/users/postgres/testversion (You might also want --enable-cassert when working with beta code.) Build, and make install as per normal --- it will go into the directory you specified as the prefix. Before doing initdb or starting the test postmaster, make sure you have environment set up to reference the test location; the critical stuff is PATH, PGLIB, PGDATA, and USER (initdb uses USER to decide who'll be superuser). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: