Re: Postgres Replaying WAL slowly
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres Replaying WAL slowly |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21474.1404160784@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres Replaying WAL slowly (Jeff Frost <jeff@pgexperts.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres Replaying WAL slowly
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Jeff Frost <jeff@pgexperts.com> writes: > On Jun 30, 2014, at 1:15 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> So these are probably relations created in uncommitted >> transactions. Possibly ON COMMIT DROP temp tables? > That would make sense. There are definitely quite a few of those being used. Uh-huh. I doubt that the mechanism that handles propagation of AccessExclusiveLocks to the standby is smart enough to ignore locks on temp tables :-( > Another item of note is the system catalogs are quite bloated: > Would that cause the replica to spin on StandbyReleaseLocks? AFAIK, no. It's an unsurprising consequence of heavy use of short-lived temp tables though. So it seems like we have a candidate explanation. I'm a bit surprised that StandbyReleaseLocks would get this slow if there are only a dozen AccessExclusiveLocks in place at any one time, though. Perhaps that was a low point and there are often many more? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: