Re: Vacuum analyze infos
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vacuum analyze infos |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21457.1031686469@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Vacuum analyze infos (Jean-Arthur Silve <jeanarthur@eurovox.fr>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Jean-Arthur Silve <jeanarthur@eurovox.fr> writes: > NOTICE: Pages 7430: Changed 0, Empty 0; Tup 154392: Vac 6271, Keep 0, > UnUsed 451218. > Total CPU 0.05s/0.34u sec elapsed 1.80 sec. > what is the difference wetween Vac and and unUsed ? IIRC, "Vac" is the number of tuples freed in this VACUUM pass. "UnUsed" is the total number of free tuple slots (linepointers) in the table. I'm not sure if that includes the just-freed ones or not. > Is unUsed spaces unUsed but not deleted ? Freed slot pointers are available for re-use later. But the fact that there are many more free pointers than used pointers (450k vs 155k in your example) suggests to me that a VACUUM FULL might be appropriate. If you find that VACUUM FULL reduces the file size (number of pages) significantly, then you should plan on more frequent regular VACUUMs and/or increasing the postmaster's FSM parameters to prevent dead space from accumulating again. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: