Re: pg_inherits: not found, but visible [IT GETS WORSE]
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_inherits: not found, but visible [IT GETS WORSE] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21437.985152045@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_inherits: not found, but visible [IT GETS WORSE] (Joel Burton <jburton@scw.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joel Burton <jburton@scw.org> writes: > Yikes. It gets weirder. > Fixed the pg_inherits problem, went back to my Zoping, trying to optimize > some views, and during another run, get an error that trelclasspq, one of > my tables, couldn't open. > Trying this out in psql, I get the same error message--the file doesn't > exist. And, getting the oid for the file, looked in the directory--and > this file is gone too! This does not seem good. Just to clarify: in both cases, the pg_class row for the table is still there, but the underlying Unix file is gone? Barring major malfeasance from your kernel, it seems like Postgres must be issuing a delete on the wrong file when you are doing something else. This is particularly bizarre if you are just doing create/delete view, because in 7.1 a view hasn't got any associated file, and so no unlink() kernel call should be issued at all. I would recommend that you try to narrow down the events leading up to this --- in particular, keeping a postmaster log of queries issued (-d2) seems like a good idea. > I doubt the error is Zope *per se*, Zope cannot be the culprit --- there is no API for deleting a table file without deleting its pg_class entry ;-). But it seems possible that some peculiar pattern of queries that they issue could be triggering a previously-unknown Postgres bug. I will be out of town all day tomorrow, but please see what data you can gather. If you can create a reproducible failure case it'd be great... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: