Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21403.1190036229@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used
Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used |
Список | pgsql-performance |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 2:49 AM, in message > <1190015368.148293.56830@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>, valgog > <valgog@gmail.com> wrote:=20 >> Are you sure you understood what was the question? >> >> Is the TBL1.CATEGORY = TBL2.CATEGORY the same as TBL1.CATEGORY & >> TBL2.CATEGORY > 0? > Yes, given that he stipulated that one and only one bit would be set. Really? In that case, isn't this bit-field just a bad implementation of an enum-style field? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: