Re: Sorting items in aggregate function
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sorting items in aggregate function |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21365.1158093475@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sorting items in aggregate function (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Sorting items in aggregate function (thanks)
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> writes: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 04:46:28PM +0100, Steven Murdoch wrote: >> Here is an example of a setup and what I could like to achieve. Does >> anyone have suggestions on what is the best way to get the desired >> result? > Use the aggregate over an ordered subquery: > SELECT name, trim(concat(code || ' ')) AS codes > FROM ( > SELECT a.name, b.code > FROM a > LEFT JOIN ab ON a.id = ab.a_id > LEFT JOIN b ON ab.b_id = b.id > ORDER BY b.code > ) AS s > GROUP BY name > ORDER BY name; Note that if you need to GROUP in the outer query, it's best to sort the inner query's output first by the outer query's grouping: SELECT name, trim(concat(code || ' ')) AS codes FROM ( SELECT a.name, b.code FROM a LEFT JOIN ab ON a.id = ab.a_id LEFT JOIN b ON ab.b_id = b.id ORDER BY a.name, b.code ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ) AS s GROUP BY name ORDER BY name; This way will still work if the planner decides to use a GroupAggregate (which in fact it probably will, if it sees it can avoid another sort step). The way Michael showed will only work if the plan uses HashAggregate --- if the planner decides it needs Sort+GroupAggregate in the outer query, the re-sort will probably destroy the ordering by b.code. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: