Re: kill -KILL: What happens?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: kill -KILL: What happens? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21351.1294967426@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: kill -KILL: What happens? (Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: kill -KILL: What happens?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> writes: > I don't believe there's one right answer to that. Right. Force-kill presumes there is only one right answer. > Assume postgres is driving a website, and the postmaster crashes shortly > after a pg_dump run started. You probably won't want your website to be > offline while pg_dump is finishing its backup. > If, on the other hand, your data warehousing database is running a > multi-hour query, you might prefer that query to finish, even at the price > of not being able to accept new connections. > So maybe there should be a GUC for this? No need (and rather inflexible anyway). If you don't want an orphaned backend to continue, you send it SIGTERM. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: