Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21301.1238171603@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?
Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > I think this is way over-engineered. All we really need here is a > command along the lines of RESET ALL AS CURRENT USER that gives every > GUC the value it would have had if you logged in under the current > user's account. Simple, clean, no new keywords. Doesn't do anything for autovacuum though... BTW, does pg_dumpall know to dump ALTER USER SET settings attached to built-in roles (such as the proposed "autovacuum" role)? I'd bet it doesn't do that. Even if it does, that seems like a more awkward way to push settings over to a new installation than copying your postgresql.conf file. Simon's idea of "profiles" sounds worth pursuing to me, but clearly it's not happening for 8.4. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: