Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths
От | Mark Kirkwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 212e7d62-7790-9d48-64ba-271af712f776@catalyst.net.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths (Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 29/05/17 16:26, Erik Rijkers wrote: > On 2017-05-29 00:17, Mark Kirkwood wrote: >> On 28/05/17 19:01, Mark Kirkwood wrote: >> >>> So running in cloud land now...so for no errors - will update. >> >> The framework ran 600 tests last night, and I see 3 'NOK' results, i.e >> 3 failed test runs (all scale 25 and 8 pgbench clients). Given the way > > Could you also give the params for the successful runs? Scale 25, clients 90 and 64, scale 5 clients 90, 64 and 8 (i.e the defaults in the driver script). > > Can you say anything about hardware? (My experience is that older, > slower, 'worse' hardware makes for more fails.) It's running in a openstack cloud (so is a libvirt guest): 4 cpus, 4 GB ram and 2 disks: one for each Postgres instance, both formatted xfs. Hmm so maybe I should run a VM on my workstation and crank the IOPS limit way down...in the meantime I'll just let it run :-) > > > Many thanks, by the way. I'm glad that it turns out I'm probably not > doing something uniquely stupid (although I'm not glad that there > seems to be a bug, and an elusive one at that) > > Yeah looks like something subtle :-( Hopefully now its out in the open we'll all figure it together! regards Mark
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: