Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2128694.1765826341@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) (Bryan Green <dbryan.green@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bryan Green <dbryan.green@gmail.com> writes:
> On 12/15/2025 12:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... It did work if I set lc_messages to 'C.utf8', which is a
>> known name according to this box's "locale -a", but this doesn't give
>> me a warm feeling about this approach being a lot more portable than
>> what we have. Any ideas?
> My answer did not feel like it was right, so I checked multiple versions
> and realized there is a check.
> ...
> C.utf8 works because it is not "C" so is treated as a real locale.
Ah-hah. I didn't think they hadn't optimized the case at all.
Experimenting here, it looks like 'C.UTF-8' might be accepted
everywhere. I even got it to pass on Solaris's not-GNU gettext,
which I thought for sure would be the weak spot in the idea.
I'll press forward with that.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: