Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21286.1106087356@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*) (Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql@empires.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql@empires.org> writes: > I almost think to not supply an MVCC system would break the "I" in ACID, > would it not? Certainly not; ACID was a recognized goal long before anyone thought of MVCC. You do need much more locking to make it work without MVCC, though --- for instance, a reader that is interested in a just-modified row has to block until the writer completes or rolls back. People who hang around Postgres too long tend to think that MVCC is the obviously correct way to do things, but much of the rest of the world thinks differently ;-) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: