Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21265.1055359701@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user (Kaarel <kaarel@future.ee>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user
Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user |
Список | pgsql-general |
Kaarel <kaarel@future.ee> writes: > This makes me wonder why is the default configuration so conservative? There are still a lot of platforms where desirable settings will cause the database to fail to start, because the default kernel limits on shared memory are still set for 1980s-vintage hardware. We have had a policy for a long time that we'd rather the out-of-the-box settings be guaranteed to start than that they be optimal for performance. No one is going to get as far as testing performance if the system won't start for them. Having said that, though, I do wonder whether we couldn't bump them up a little. Are there still any live platforms where the default SHMMAX is less than 4 MB? (There was discussion of this a month or two back on pghackers, but no conclusion.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: