Re: pg_ctl idempotent option
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_ctl idempotent option |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21264.1358176968@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_ctl idempotent option (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_ctl idempotent option
Re: pg_ctl idempotent option Re: pg_ctl idempotent option Re: pg_ctl idempotent option Re: pg_ctl idempotent option |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > Here is a patch to add an option -I/--idempotent to pg_ctl, the result > of which is that pg_ctl doesn't error on start or stop if the server is > already running or already stopped. Idempotent is a ten-dollar word. Can we find something that average people wouldn't need to consult a dictionary to understand? Also, should the option affect *only* the result code as you have it, or should it also change the printed messages to reflect that the case is considered expected? Also it appears to me that the hunk at lines 812ff is changing the default behavior, which is not what the patch is advertised to do. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: