Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21255.1260331714@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through
JDBC
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > 2009/12/8 Oleg Jurtšenko <oleg.jurtsenko@fts.ee>: >> You are right, it crushes on following statement: "select >> instr(ad_parent_tree(?,?),'|'||?||'|') AS isItsOwnChild from dual;" >> >> max_stack_depth is commented out, I think it has the default value: >> #max_stack_depth = 2MB > Well, my guess is you have your kernel limit for max stack depth set > to something very small. See: > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/runtime-config-resource.html#GUC-MAX-STACK-DEPTH > You can do "SHOW max_stack_depth;" to confirm the setting for that > parameter. But I'm not quite sure how to check what value is being > applied to PG. Sounds like it's smaller than 2MB, though. You may be > able to reduce max_stack_depth to prevent the crash, but then you'll > get an error instead. The weird thing about this is that recent versions of PG try to adjust max_stack_depth automatically. The only ways I can see for that to fail is if (1) the platform hasn't got getrlimit(RLIMIT_STACK), or (2) the effective stack rlimit is so tiny Postgres doesn't believe it, which looks to be anything under 100KB. The claim in the docs that the default value is 2MB is a vast oversimplification of reality, so I'd be interested to know what "show max_stack_depth" actually reports. It'd also be useful to run "ulimit -a" in the context in which the postmaster is normally started (that's NOT your interactive shell session, usually --- try adding that to the postmaster start script). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: