Re: Stored procedures vs Functions
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Stored procedures vs Functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21224.1008988750@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Stored procedures vs Functions (Jeff Davis <list-pgsql-general@dynworks.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Jeff Davis <list-pgsql-general@dynworks.com> writes: > I was trying it out and I had no problem creating the > function. However, if I have a function that returns a reference to a > cursor, how would I got about fetching form that cursor reference? I > guess my question is: with SQL, how do I turn the cursor reference > into an actual cursor from which I may fetch records? I don't think you can do it in pure SQL; the facility is really designed for passing back a cursor name to another plpgsql function, or an application that is able to substitute the returned cursor name into a query. Given > jdavis=# begin; > BEGIN > jdavis=# select f1(); > f1 > -------------------- > <unnamed cursor 5> > (1 row) you need to do fetch 1 from "<unnamed cursor 5>"; psql has a primitive variable-substitution facility, but I don't think that's quite smart enough to handle this. It'd be easy enough in almost any application programming language, however. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: