Re: OpenBSD/Sparc status
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: OpenBSD/Sparc status |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21183.1100819869@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: OpenBSD/Sparc status (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: OpenBSD/Sparc status
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Consistently? I'd have thought that problem would only fail once in a >> while. It's hard to believe the timing would work out to make it a 100% >> failure. > You can see the history of the latest build runs here: > http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=spoonbill&br=HEAD Remarkable. There is one run (2004-11-15) where it got past the rtree test (and did indeed fail at seg) but the failure rate is certainly upwards of 90%. Curious. There must be some effect that is synchronizing the bgwriter's actions with the test sequence. Back at the ranch, I am even more surprised to note that the bogus seg output in the 11-15 run is different from what it is in today's. There's not much I can do about it without access to a machine where it's failing though. Can we get personal accounts on the buildfarm machines? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: