Re: User privileges-verification required
| От | Nauman Naeem |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: User privileges-verification required |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 211765b50602270809v7f626ce9i4ea2f1e3a9362162@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: User privileges-verification required (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Yeah it really was :-) BTW I have implemented this for multiuser-mode as well......Both the approaches as mentioned in my very first email...
1- The minimum super user count should not be less then 1.
2- Only the main database system owner is eligible to reassign.
My personal believe is, this minimum functionality should be a part of multiuser mode! I was oblivious of this and did initdb twice, may be I am dumb :-)
Thanks,
Nauman
On 2/26/06, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> wrote:
> In my opinion we should cater for such a situation, and two possible
> solutions come to my mind for this:
I've done exactly this before, and had to use single user mode to
recover. Annoying.
> 1. Place a restriction that there should be more than one superuser
> before you can issue a "NOCREATEUSER" command.
I agree :)
Chris
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: