Re: point -> double,double ?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: point -> double,double ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21148.1042862575@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: point -> double,double ? (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: point -> double,double ?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes: > Hm, this seems odd > slo=> select b,b[0],b[0][0] from t; > b | b | b > -----------------------------------------------+------------------------+--- > (-75.493906,44.854114),(-75.493906,44.854114) | (-75.493906,44.854114) | > (1 row) The problem here is that foo[m][n] is our notation for a doubly-subscripted array --- and we don't have any concept in the type system that a one-dimensional array is different from a two-dimensional array. So the code goes down the primrose path of assuming that "b" is a 2-D array of points, rather than expecting b[0] to yield a separate datatype that should be separately subscripted. We could perhaps hack something for this particular case, since box is known not to be a general array but only a hardwired one-dimensional array of points. I don't see a good general solution though. Any thoughts? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: