Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21136.1233171516@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable
Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: > I don't think partitioning is really the same thing as row-level > security. Of course not, but it seems to me that it can be used to accomplish most of the same practical use-cases. The main gripe about doing it via partitioning is that the user's nose gets rubbed in the fact that there can't be an enormous number of different security classifications in the same table (since he has to explicitly make a partition for each one). But the proposed implementation of row-level security would poop out pretty darn quick for such a case, too, and frankly I'm not seeing an application that would demand it. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: