Re: Use of LOCAL in SET command
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Use of LOCAL in SET command |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21088.1024951070@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Use of LOCAL in SET command (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Use of LOCAL in SET command
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > Sorry to nag about this so late, but I fear that the new command SET LOCAL > will cause some confusion later on. Okay... > SQL uses LOCAL to mean the local node in a distributed system (SET LOCAL > TRANSACTION ...) and the current session as opposed to all sessions (local > temporary table). The new SET LOCAL command adds the meaning "this > transaction only". Instead we could simply use SET TRANSACTION, which > would be consistent in behaviour with the SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL > command. Hmm ... this would mean that the implicit parsing of SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL would change (instead of SET / TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL you'd now tend to read it as SET TRANSACTION / ISOLATION LEVEL) but I guess that would still not create any parse conflicts. I'm okay with this as long as we can fix psql's command completion stuff to handle it intelligently. I hadn't gotten round to looking at that point yet for the LOCAL case; do you have any thoughts? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: